includeonly造句

• I tried using includeonly which works if you edit an included subsection page ( look at User : Lar / Sandbox and User : Lar / Sandbox / album Q, one of the sections ) but not so well for what I want as when you click on the section edit tag it edits only a section of the inclusion.
• I've seen " make inline image use within < includeonly > text show up in an image's file links " being proposed as a solution, but I believe a " includeonly preview " mode would be more useful if it is technically feasible, as it can also be useful for ordinary template testing.
• I've seen " make inline image use within < includeonly > text show up in an image's file links " being proposed as a solution, but I believe a " includeonly preview " mode would be more useful if it is technically feasible, as it can also be useful for ordinary template testing.
• Because there is always a link to the update page on the item page, and the update page has the date on it, i want the update page to have an additional note with the date entered ( between onlyinclude tags ) and i don't want it to appear on the update page itself ( between includeonly tags ).
• Another problem was caused by the change in semantics of < onlyinclude > ( which indirectly affected Portal : Current events, and possibly other pages ); it now no longer removes whitespace from the same line, and therefore now behaves the same way as < includeonly > and < noinclude >.
• Aren't they really documented anywhere ? ( Google gave me just one mail-list post for search " includeonly wikipedia-latex " . ) Is there any reason yet, why we shouldn't use in all the templates putting pages into categories ( starting from, for example,, etc ., etc . ) ? & mdash; ( T ) 07 : 48, 22 August 2005 ( UTC)
• Yes, onlyinclude / includeonly / noinclude are probably your best bet here; they are probably a bit too confusing for an average editor, though, which is I normally suggest to just use child templates . ( I'm not referring to you as an average editor since you seem to know what you're doing with code, but I'm talking about editors that might come across your templates and not know how to edit it because it's too confusing .)
• I've been writing a few redirection templates to help with fictional characters and tv episodes ( eg, and a user noticed that, when using the template, the text that is in the template that is not within the " noinclude " markup but also not contained in the " includeonly " markup does not show up on the page with the redirection; it is present when you preview it, but it is also very obvious there is a difference in how the preview is shown, and then how the actual resulting page looks ( which contains the down / right 90deg arrow and large text with the redirect page name ).