yahwist造句

• The supposed discrepancy is often explained as reflecting the discordance between the different scribal traditions behind the composition of the Pentateuch, the former relating to the Yahwist, the latter to the Elohist recension, according to the documentary hypothesis of modern scholarship.
• The two stories are complementary and not overlapping, with the first ( the Priestly story ) concerned with the creation of the entire cosmos, while the second ( the Yahwist story ) focuses on man as cultivator of his environment and as a moral agent.
• Form critics regard this part of the manna narrative to be spliced together from the Yahwist and Priestly traditions, with the Yahwist tradition emphasizing rest during Shabbat, while the Priestly tradition merely states that Shabbat exists, implying that the meaning of " Shabbat " was already known.
• Form critics regard this part of the manna narrative to be spliced together from the Yahwist and Priestly traditions, with the Yahwist tradition emphasizing rest during Shabbat, while the Priestly tradition merely states that Shabbat exists, implying that the meaning of " Shabbat " was already known.
• The five books are drawn from four " sources " ( distinct schools of writers rather than individuals ) : the Priestly source, the Yahwist and the Elohist ( these two are often referred to collectively as the " non-Priestly " source ), and the Deuteronomist.
• Friedman's thesis in " The Hidden Book in the Bible " is that the Yahwist author wrote many of the most familiar stories in the Hebrew Bible ( including the stories of Adam and Eve, Abraham, Moses, and David ) as one unified text.
• The supplementary hypothesis denies the existence of an extensive Elohist ( E ) source, one of the four independent sources described in the documentary hypothesis; instead the hypothesis describes the Yahwist as having borrowed from an array of written and oral traditions, combing these into the J source.
• Richard Elliott Friedman has recently suggested in his book " The Hidden Book in the Bible " that the Court History and the Accession History were originally part of a single historical epic by the Yahwist author covering the history of the Israelite world until the time of David and Solomon.
• Chapters 1 24 ( from bondage in Egypt to God's appearances at Sinai ) and chapters 32 34 ( the golden calf incident ) are from the Yahwist and P's additions are relatively minor, noting Israel's obedience to the command to be fruitful and the orderly nature of Israel even in Egypt.
• The supplementary approach was dominant by the early 1860s, but it was challenged by an important book published by Hermann Hupfeld in 1853, who argued that the Pentateuch was made up of four documentary sources, the Priestly, Yahwist and Elohist intertwined in Genesis-Exodus-Leviticus-Numbers, plus the stand-alone source of Deuteronomy.
• In classical rabbinical literature, Reuben is described as being motivated by a sense of responsibility over his brothers ( since he was the eldest ), and as having become angry when he discovers that Joseph had gone missing as a result of his brothers selling him to Ishmaelites ( textual scholars attribute this version of the narrative to the Yahwist ) or ( textual scholars attribute this version of the narrative to the Elohist
• The history of the traditions of Israel, like the history of worship, shows a steady progression from the epic and prophetic age of the Yahwist and the Elohist, to the law-bound world of the Priestly source, with Deuteronomy acting as the bridge . " In Chronicles the past is remodelled on the basis of the Law : transgressions take place now and then, but as exceptions from the rule.
• At around the same period Karl Heinrich Graf argued that the Yahwist and Elohist were the earliest sources and the Priestly source the latest, and Wilhelm Vatke linked the four to an evolutionary framework, the Yahwist and Elohist to a time of primitive nature and fertility cults, the Deuteronomist to the ethical religion of the Hebrew prophets, and the Priestly source to a form of religion dominated by ritual, sacrifice and law.
• At around the same period Karl Heinrich Graf argued that the Yahwist and Elohist were the earliest sources and the Priestly source the latest, and Wilhelm Vatke linked the four to an evolutionary framework, the Yahwist and Elohist to a time of primitive nature and fertility cults, the Deuteronomist to the ethical religion of the Hebrew prophets, and the Priestly source to a form of religion dominated by ritual, sacrifice and law.
• His book " Der sogenannte Jahwist " ( " The So-called Yahwist ", 1976 ) appeared at about the same time as two other important works, John Van Seters "'Abraham in History and Tradition " ( 1975 ), and Rolf Rendtorff's " Das 黚erlieferungsgeschichtliche Problem des Pentateuch " ( " The Problem of the Transmission of the Pentateuch ", 1977 ).
• Whereas the documentary hypothesis proposed that the four Pentateuch sources were complete and independent accounts, Van Seters writes that the supplementary hypothesis  does not view the later sources J and P as independent documents but as direct additions to the earlier corpus .  The hypothesis proposed that the Deuteronomist is the only independent source and that the Yahwist ( J ) is a reply to the Deuteronomic explanation of the Exile and a  confessional reformulation as a theological corrective.
• The book comments that this corresponds with the documentary hypothesis, in which Judah ( the patriarch ), and Hebron, more than on characters and places from the northern kingdom ( Israel ); " the Bible Unearthed " explains this pre-eminence of Yahwist text as an attempt to seize the opportunity, afforded by the destruction of Israel in 720 BCE, to portray the Israelites as a single people, with Judah having ( always ) had primacy.
• Among other things, leprous, and water was transmuted into blood, In the text, Yahweh instructs Moses to take " this staff " in his hands, in order to perform miracles with it, as if it is a staff given to him, rather than his own; some textual scholars propose that this latter instruction is the Elohist's version of the more detailed earlier description, where Moses uses his own staff, which they attribute to the Yahwist.
• Scholars in the first half of the 20th century came to the conclusion that the Yahwist was produced in the monarchic period, specifically at the court of Solomon, 10th century BC, and the Priestly work in the middle of the 5th century BC ( the author was even identified as Ezra ), but more recent thinking is that the Yahwist was written either just before or during the Babylonian exile of the 6th century BC, and the Priestly final edition was made late in the Exilic period or soon after.
• Scholars in the first half of the 20th century came to the conclusion that the Yahwist was produced in the monarchic period, specifically at the court of Solomon, 10th century BC, and the Priestly work in the middle of the 5th century BC ( the author was even identified as Ezra ), but more recent thinking is that the Yahwist was written either just before or during the Babylonian exile of the 6th century BC, and the Priestly final edition was made late in the Exilic period or soon after.