atelic造句
例句与造句
- Furthermore, Finnish has separate telic ( completed ) and atelic ( ongoing ) direct objects.
- Achievements, accomplishments and semelfactives have telic situation aspect, while states and activities have atelic situation aspect.
- However, in negative sentences, telic objects become atelic, even if the meaning is still " telic " ( completed ).
- But if a sentence containing an atelic verbal phrase is embedded within the context of a past time narrative, it would be interpreted as past.
- With atelic verbs, there is a regular contrast between indirective evidentiality marked by " sima " and witnessed evidentiality marked by " nikuu ".
- It's difficult to find atelic in a sentence. 用atelic造句挺难的
- However, even inherently atelic verbs such as " rakastaa " " to love " can in semantically unusual constructions, where a kind of result is involved, become telic:
- Telic prepositional phrases imply movement all the way to the endpoint ( " she ran to the fence " ), while atelic ones do not ( " she ran towards the fence " ).
- Each verb stem has an unpredictable inherent aspect value ( either atelic; by default, a bare stem is inherently atelic ), and an inherent value for transitivity ( transitive, intransitive or impersonal ).
- Each verb stem has an unpredictable inherent aspect value ( either atelic; by default, a bare stem is inherently atelic ), and an inherent value for transitivity ( transitive, intransitive or impersonal ).
- The terms " telic " and " atelic " are not traditionally used in Finnish grammatical description; instead, it is customary to speak of " resultative " and " irresultative " sentences.
- A verb or verb phrase with this property is said to be " telic ", while a verb or verb phrase that presents an action or event as being " incomplete " is said to be " atelic ".
- Put differently, one can simply define telic verbs and verb phrases as referring to events " "'conceptualized or presented as " "'having endpoints, and atelic verbs and verb phrases as those conceptualized or presented as lacking endpoints.
- The "'partitive verbs "'roughly correspond with atelic verbs in Garey's definition, that is, the action normally does not have a result or goal, and it would be logically and grammatically incorrect to place them in the telic aspect.
- The aorist ( ) would mean " we finished dinner " and would be a telic verb, implying that the action was carried through to its end, whereas the imperfect ( ) would mean " we began eating dinner " and would be atelic, implying that the action was started but not necessarily completed.
- Other phrases can be tested similarly; for example, " walked home " is telic, because " John walked home in an hour " is fine, while " John walked home for an hour " is bad, and " walked around " is atelic, because " John walked around in an hour " is bad, while " John walked around for an hour " is fine.