disconfirming造句

例句与造句

1. Disconfirming evidence that Menezes was the suspect may have been present, but interpreted incorrectly.
2. "If some disconfirming news comes in, people say that was ` random noise, "'
3. Relationships change when one or both of the partners behave unexpectedly, disconfirming previously-held expectations in a positive or negative way.
4. Similarly, disconfirming behavior can be discredited an many ways, including but not limited to selective attention to confirmatory evidence and biased labeling.
5. Stevenson searched for disconfirming evidence and alternative explanations for the reports, and believed that his strict methods ruled out all possible " normal " explanations for the child s memories.
6. It's difficult to find disconfirming in a sentence. 用disconfirming造句挺难的
7. Disconfirming evidence can lead to cognitive dissonance on the part of these individuals, and lead them to deliberately or unconsciously attempt to resolve dissonance by ignoring, discounting or even destroying the evidence.
8. A well-documented fact about self-concepts is that they are resistant to change, even in the face of what would seem to be disconfirming facts that are recognized by the person.
9. Once any steps are taken to justify the decision that the accused is guilty, it becomes very difficult for the official to accept disconfirming evidence, and this can continue during appeals, retrials or any other effort to revisit a verdict.
10. He compared the memories with reports of people known to the deceased, attempting to do so before any contact between the child and the deceased's family had occurred, and searched for disconfirming evidence that could provide alternative explanations for the reports aside from reincarnation.
11. The only reason this is on the list is because some scholar was " of the opinion " that the topic itself was silly and research into it sillier, and while I wouldn't disagree, this "'is not the result of scientific research "'and therefore "'not a reliable source "'for this topic . it's just some guy's opinion . so, you have a scholar who ( a ) insults religion and ( b ) disregards what appears to be valid disconfirming scientific evidence, and you have wikipedia bolstering this misconception and using it to cast aspersions on other topics . and yet you're arguing we should include this on the grounds of literalism ( that he's a reliable source, and policy says that reliable sources are included, regardless of whether what they say has merit . . . ) . what are you, a closet creationist?