undercited造句
例句与造句
- *The article is, I think, a little undercited.
- The article is undercited-as an example, see the " Justiciability " section.
- I agree that it is undercited, including for non-mathematical non-obivous claims.
- More significantly, the article is still massively undercited; at minimum, hard data needs citation.
- :The article is undercited, and doesn't appear to refer to the highest quality medical sources.
- It's difficult to find undercited in a sentence. 用undercited造句挺难的
- *The article is massively undercited : once it is fully referenced, it could be submitted to a new peer review.
- This should be used sparingly; Wikipedia has a lot of undercited articles, and inserting many instances of is unlikely to be beneficial.
- In my opinion, it is not acceptable to just say " Weasle words, undercited, "-that is a not a substantive comment.
- As for undercited sections, " Administration, " " Use and Abuse in Sports " and " Minimizing the Side Effects " seem to be the major offenders.
- It " is " undercited, but only just-the topic of most concern regarding the citations is that they are totally lacking in one or two sections.
- I'd also like to point out that 69 recently changed Bladder from a redirect to Urinary bladder to an undercited article, and then went to change all the links to bladder to " urinary bladder ", because of the existence of the gallbladder.
- *"'Remove "'- the article is still undercited, a number of the references used don't appear to be to reliable sources, and some of the references can't be tracked down ( an ibid to a non-specific source ).
- *The article is a bit undercited for a GA . At least one footnote per paragraph is a good general rule, and there are factual statements that really need citation . ( For example, " He is reported to have made most of the journey barefoot . " Who reported it ?)
- :The article is seriously undercited, doesn't conform to WP : LAYOUT or WP : MEDMOS, doesn't use the highest quality sources specific to the subject area, doesn't cite PMIDs, has an External link farm, the lead is overly technical and not a compelling summary, the article mixes citation styles and uses weasle words.
- Numerous short, stubby sections and one or two-sentence paragraphs, See also need attention ( some could be linked in to article ), undercited and References are blue links that need to be converted to a bibliographic style, external jumps, possible External link farm, and several different means of referring to See also / Further within text that should use templates.
更多例句： 下一页
