无过错责任

• No - fault liability should play dominant role in this dualistic system and it should be preferentially adopted according to the special provision of chinese law
  我国环境侵权二元归责体系中，无过错责任原则应居主导地位，在法律有特别规定时优先适用。
• And compensation for ip do not accord with the idea of responsibility by non faults . most of foreign countries adopt responsibility by faults in compensation for ip
  笔者认为知识产权的特征不能成为采用无过错原则的理由；知识产权侵权损害赔偿与无过错责任的理念不符。
• But if we let victims bear all the losses , it would violate the sense of justice . so in these situations , the law will have someone without fault undertake the liability
  同时,由于这种责任是从人的关系而不是理性对行为的控制的角度出发的,因而本质上是一种无过错责任。
• The article analysed the definition of public utilities and the possible disputes , and believes that the principle of national indemnity caused by public utilities should be non - fault principle
  本文认为公有公共设施致害国家赔偿的归责原则应采无过错责任原则,并对此进行了简要阐释。
• Owing to the nature of copyright and the feature of the infringement , a dual rule for fault or no - fault liability should be established according to the types of infringement
  由于版权自身性质和版权侵权行为的特点，在版权领域应建立根据侵权类型分别适用过错责任和无过错责任的二元归责体系。
• In this thesis , the author mainly investigates the application of liability without fault principle and causation of epidemic disease in this kind of crime
  对破坏环境资源保护罪在刑事责任上应采用无过错责任原则，在处罚上扩大罚金刑和非刑罚措施，在司法认定该罪因果关系上应采纳疫学的因果关系。
• So after the civil code of france , the concept of “ fault ” which stemmed from roman law was accepted by all the civil codes of the world and became one of the three basic principles of modern civil law
  从罗马法到现代民法,都存在着不以行为人的主观过错为要件的侵权责任形式,即“无过错责任” 。
• Through the re - understanding of fair liability , the author holds that " fair liability " is not truly " fair " because it shows more " order " than " justice "
  通过对公平内涵的再认识，对公平责任与过错责任和无过错责任的区别，作者认为“公平责任”并不真正“公平” ，它体现的更多的是“秩序”而不是“公平” 。
• In the field of ip infringement , because of the special features therein , there is no commonly applicable liability principle and there is no - commonly applicable indispensable factors of infringement
  过错责任原则是以主观上的过错为责任构成要件的，而无过错责任原则和公平责任原则不以主观过错为责任构成要件。
• Although the liability of fault is the principle of civil law , it is not the only basis of undertaking liability for people . this is because that in social lives , there are always accidents for which nobody has “ fault ”
  这类责任又可分为两种,以建筑物责任为代表的“对物的无过错责任”和以父母责任为代表的“对人的无过错责任。 ”