严打

• Because “ strict punishment ” implements its purpose by strengthening the government penal punish power . it may cause and even aggravate the tension between the state ’ s penal power and rule by law
  因为, “严打”是通过强化国家刑罚惩罚力度的手段来实现其政策目的的,由此可能引发和加剧国家刑罚权与法治的紧张关系。
• Abstract ： the three “ severe crackdown ” campaigns conducted in 1983 ， 1996 and 2001 ， their respective backgrounds ， targets and effects ， are the objects of analysis in this paper
  本文以转型中国社会治安治理中的“严打”政策为研究对象，具体考察了1983年、 1996年和2001年全国范围内三次“严打”斗争的发动背景、打击对象、主要做法和治理绩效。
• The guidelines for both penal legislation and penal judicature mean increasing the weight of punishment . and the principle of the distribution of punishment should consolidate justice and benefit . if not , the punishment may be not proper
  “严打”对刑事立法和刑事司法的指导体现为对加重刑罚的分配,而刑罚的分配应是公正与效益的统一,这样所分配的刑罚才是正当而合理的。
• Since january 1st all death sentences have had first to be approved by the supreme people ' s court ? a practice that had been suspended after the launch of china ' s “ strike hard ” crackdown on crime in 2003 , when publicly admitted executions soared to more than 7 , 000
  从1月1日开始，所有的死刑首先要经过最高人民法院的核准? ?中国2003年展开对犯罪活动的“严打”之后暂停了这一做法，当时公开承认的死刑执行数量高达7000余项。
• “ strict punishment ” is the abbreviation of “ severe cracking down the severe crime which harm social security badly ” . the penal policy came into being in a special age that feathered severe public order . it is a kind of criminal act that cracks down crime and shows our government ’ s strong and tough attitude on severe crime
  “严打” ,即“严厉打击严重危害社会治安的犯罪分子”的简称,是针对我国在社会转型期犯罪现象严重、犯罪态势严峻这一特殊社会形势而制定的一项具体刑事政策。
• According to the excruciation on whether “ strict punishment ” has the grounds , i have made this conclusion : we can increase the weight of punishment in legislation because of severe public order , but it must be restricted by the seriousness of crime , which means the punishment can not go beyond the horizon that the crime can permit . although , increasing the weight of punishment in judicature according to the situation is not true
  通过对“严打”的配刑根据的考问,笔者得出如下结论:在立法上可以根据社会形势严峻加重配刑,但这种加重又必须受到犯罪的严重性的限制,即不得超出犯罪的轻重所允许的限度;在司法上绝对不可以根据社会治安形势加重配刑。因此,立法层面的“严打”是可以的,但必须受犯罪严重性的限制;而司法层面的严打是不正当的。
• The essay includes : a review of past tougher punishment practices so as to correctly handle the relations between punishment and defense ; research into the significance of social security defense from angles of economic analysis , social analysis , social transformation and social policies ; moreover , the challenge of grave situations under a dynamic environment requires that public security institutions take the psdcs construction as their strategic choice
  包括：总结回顾严打实践，正确处理打防辩证关系；从经济分析、社会性分析、社会转型和社会政策的视角研究探讨社会治安防范的重要性；动态环境下严峻治安形势的挑战要求公安机关必须把防控体系建设作为战略选择。社会治安社会治。