The second part : the transillumination and review . af - ter the concretely anayzing the happening of the proced - ure value , value , legal value and legal procedure valued - he article points out that the value of dsb of wto contains the inside value and outside value 第二部分：是对wto争端解决机制的价值透视及评价。通过程序价值论的兴起，以及对价值、法律价值和法律程序价值的具体考辩，指出了wto争端解决机制的价值包括内在价值和外在价值。
Although prosecuting and punishing crime is the origin and the basic function of criminal procedure , modern criminal procedure has an increasing function of protecting the rights of all the parties involved with the progress of human society and the projection of the value in procedure 摘要刑事程序虽以追究与惩罚犯罪，实现国家刑罚权为其形成原因和基本功能，但随着人类社会的进步和程序价值的日益彰显，现代刑事程序具有越来越多的保障权利的功能。
Pre - trial procedure fully embodies the value of civil litigation procedure , helps to bring about procedure justness and object justness in civil cases , make litigation efficient , protect civil rights , promote to slove disputes in civil case and realize its social benefits 审前程序充分体现了民事诉讼程序价值，有助于实现民事诉讼的程序公正和实体公正；有助于实现诉讼效益；有利于保护民事权利；促进民事纠纷解决；实现社会效益；有利于实现与国际司法接轨。
If we ignored the unity of the two above , and insisted on restraining the defendant ' s procedure rights in order to punish offenders efficiently , the abuse of judicial power and higher rate of mistaken cases would appear . at the same time , the goal of controlling the crime efficiently would be hard to attain . on the other hand , if the defendant ' s interests were absolutely superior to the interests of the society and its other members , the substantive reality and the value of criminal procedure would not be ensured and the order of the law would be in the failure of safeguarding 忽视两者的统一性，主张为高效率的惩治犯罪而限制被告人的诉讼权利，会产生司法权滥用的弊害，并导致较高的错案率，其高效率抑制犯罪的目的的实现也会受到妨碍；反之，如果将被告人利益置于绝对优越的地位，使之凌驾于社会及其他成员的利益之上，则会贬抑实体真实及刑事程序价值，法律秩序得不到有效维护。
The pretrial procedure of u . s . a pays attention to giving play to the role of the parties and causes the lawsuit to be delayed because that the judge can not get involved deeply ; pretrial procedure of germany pays attention to and give play to the role of judges , but apt to produce judge first impressions are strongest 美国审前程序注重发挥当事人的作用，因法官介入不深而导致诉讼拖延；德国审前程序注重了发挥法官的作用，却容易产生法官“先入为主” 。我国借鉴时应从实际出发。第四，法官助理制度的建立有助于审前准备程序价值实现。
In the first place , we should prevent deviation of the value of procedure ; in the second place , justice would be brought into effect by law . the civil judicial law which is executing in current should be strengthened in openness of judge , neutrality of gownsman , adjudgement without plaintiff or appellee , and so on 最后，文章论述了民事诉讼程序价值保障，要防止程序异化，要通过法律实现正义，具体在公开审判、法官中立、缺席审判等八个方面对民事诉讼法提出了完善建议。
Civil pretrial procedure is the starting point of the whole civil litigation procedure , it not only affect the course and the result of the trial , but also embody the level of the knowledge and admitment to the value of the procedure , in addition , it guarantee the realize of the entity right 民事审前准备程序是民事诉讼程序的起点，处于民事诉讼机制整体链条的前端，不仅对案件的审理过程和审理结果产生重要影响，还体现着一国对程序价值的认识与认同程度，并保障着实体权利的实现。
The thesis intent to begin with the litigation benefits and go on discussing the justice of procedure in the civil procedure through the methods such as analysis and authentic proof , vertical and horizontal comparing proof and exploring the interior value of jurisprudence 为此介绍了诉讼与效益、诉讼与公正之间的关系。第二章从理论上分析了诉讼程序的价值取向? ?追求诉讼效益、达到程序公正并介绍了从诉讼效益的角度探讨程序公正的最有代表性的学说? ?经济效益主义程序价值理论。
From the system value , the value basis of the trial supervision system is the fair judgment on private dispute , the right basis is the actio and disposition right of litigants , the objective basis is the pursuit to res judicata . the second part proceeds the comparative research on civil retrial system 从制度价值来看,对私权争议的公正裁判是民事再审制度存在的程序价值基础;当事人的诉权与处分权是民事再审制度构筑的权利基础;对判决既判力正当性的追求是民事再审制度构筑的目的基础。
This paper discusses the internal value of civil litigation procedure - justice , stabilization and efficiency ; the external value of civil litigation procedure - insuring justice of entity , protecting civil right and setting the pace of judiciary authority ; and when the conflict was caused between the internal value and external value , how to solve it 本文论述了民事诉讼程序价值的内在价值? ?程序公正、程序安定、程序效益；民事诉讼程序的外在价值? ?保障实体公正、保护民事权利、树立司法权威；以及民事诉讼程序内在价值和外在价值发生冲突时的价值评价。
