无过错责任

• Many facts illustrate that a vehicle is still very dangerous in the modern society , the status quo of the systems of social security and liability insurance is a decisive reason why our country should adopt no fault liability for vehicle accidents
  大量事实证明，在当今社会，机动车的高度危险性依然存在。我国社会保障制度和责任保险制度的现状决定了对机动车交通事故损害赔偿适用无过错责任才能补救机动车高度危险性所导致的事故损害。
• As to the question of the responsibility judging principle , there are fault responsibility and non - fault responsibility . we think that it ' s proper to take special fault responsibility - fault - infer responsibility as the responsibility judging principle of cpa ' s infringement responsibility
  对于注册会计师归责原则问题存在过错责任原则和无过错责任原则，我国对于注册会计师侵权贡任适宜采用过错责任原则的特例? ?过错椎定原则为其归责原则。
• The common liability principle of tortious liability of securities fraud is fault liability , with the exception of non - fault liability . so , it is not particular tortious liability but common tortious liability . on the condition of forming joint tort , the multi - actors should bear joint liability
  证券欺诈的侵权责任以过错责任为一般归责原则，以无过错责任为例外，属于一般侵权责任；在构成共同侵权的情况下，多个行为人须承担连带责任。
• With the rapid advances of technology and social development , tortuous acts assume a trend of grow in social life . the separation of tort law from the law on obligations and the establishment of no fault liability and fair liability principles mark a new historical stage of tort law
  随着技术的飞跃、社会的发展，侵权行为在社会生活中呈现扩张趋势，侵权法从债权中的分离及其无过错责任原则、公平责任原则的确立标志着我国的侵权法已经步入一个新的历史阶段。
• The text is analyzing and discussing several important and controversial legal issues on the motor vehicle third party liability compulsive insurance , putting forward some standpoints and speculations . in addition to the preface and postscript , the full text is totally divided into five parts . chapter one firstly introduces several controversies in the judicatory fulfillment on the motor vehicle third party liability compulsive insurance which caused by the judgment of the national first case , which under the background of the implement of “ road traffic safety method ” , but at that time “ the motor vehicle compulsive insurance regulation ” did n ' t yet pedestal
  《道路交通安全法》虽然规定了机动车的无过失责任原则,以图更好保护弱者受害人利益,但实际上由于机动车强制保险未真正落实,保险公司仍使用商业保险条款,否认机动车责任险具有“强制性” ,导致在面对交通事故进行赔付时出现功能错位,从而增加了机动车一方的赔偿责任,也使受害方得不到应有的救济,没有体现无过错责任原则的社会承担性。
• This article elaborates the victim has the preliminary proof responsibility , proves the implement of the causal relation estimation principle and the non - mistake responsibility principle regarding this , and expounds injures ' proof responsibility as well as the relations between the victims and injures
  论述受害人具有初步的证明责任，重点论证对此类案件应实行因果关系推定原则和无过错责任原则，阐明加害人对免责事由的证明责任以及受害人与加害人证明责任之间的关系。
• While the intension of copyright is being enriched increasingly , the remedies for copyright appear more positive than common civil remedies . for instance , traditional fault liability turns to common no - fault liability ; remedies after harm occurring has turned to initiative protections beforehand ; in addition , there exist more special ways and remedies for copyright than for the common civil rights
  在版权内涵日益丰富的同时，版权救济已经呈现出一种不同于一般民事救济的新的积极姿态，由传统的过错责任向普遍的无过错责任倾斜；由传统单纯的事后救济转变为更重视事前保护和主动保护；同时版权救济包括了更多途径并发展了多于一般民事救济的特殊救济措施。
• Chapter one is outlined of the principle of the rules of civil liability for securities fraud , in this chapter , first analysis the system of the principle of the rules of civil liability for securities fraud , the particularity of stock market determines the particularity of the principle of the rules of civil liability for securities fraud , and the stock market in our country is weak market , so doctrine of no - fault liability is used
  证券欺诈民事责任归责原则是认定证券欺诈民事责任的重要内容,研究证券欺诈民事责任归责原则对我国具有重要的现实意义。证券欺诈民事责任归责原则具有不同于一般民事责任归责原则的特殊性,其以过错推定责任原则为中心,兼顾无过错责任原则的适用。
• It should be separated the special traffic accident from the ordinary one in applying the doctrine of liability fixation on damages for traffic accident , in the special cases , principle of liability without fault needs to be adopted ; in the ordinary cases , principle of liability for wrongs needs to be done . so , we should emphasize the protection of the law on the victims of the highly dangerous work
  对于道路交通事故损害赔偿责任的归责原则的适用，应区分特殊道路交通事故与一般道路交通事故，对于特殊道路交通侵权行为适用无过错责任原则，对于一般道路交通侵权行为适用过错责任原则，强化对高度危险作业受害者的法律保护。
• Whether damages - produces are the liability subjects shall be examined by fault liability and no feult liability . while the subject of fault liability is determined by the standard " fault " , that of no fault liability is decided by the transportation interests . using the two standards : fault and transportation interests , the author specifically analyze the identification of liability subjects under such circumstance as the drive by a thief or unorthorized person , a lease - holder , a borrower , a purely transferee , or a employee , nominal user , or by a nominal remainder
  第二部分：机动车交通事故损害赔偿责任主体的认定考虑到机动车交通事故的致害人可能不只一人，致害人是否为责任主体，须经过辅责任和无过错责任两个原则的捡验，本部分详细分析了无过错责任之责任主体的认定标准，并具体分析了盗窃驾驶和擅自驾驶、租赁和借用、单纯转移机动车占有、雇员为雇主驾驶、名义贷与和名义残留场合下的损害赔偿责任主体。