This paper examines this book in stlye and arranging methods . from the comparament among the three works , we can find his serious study process that has gone from " not very mature " to " very mature " 同时，通过对这三部著述的对比分析，可以看出戴震由“未至十分之见”到达到“十分之见”的严肃的治学过程。
To some degree , he agreed with dai zhen ' s opinions on the study of reasons , however , neither dai zhen ' s ideas to study the reasons by exegesis of meaning of words nor zhang xuecheng ' s thoughts was accepted at that time 戴震以训诂明义理的新学风难以拓展和章学诚的学术思想在当时难以引起共鸣，皆可见乾嘉学术风气影响之深刻。
Zhang xuecheng made a systematic evaluation on dai zhen ' s scholarship in the 54th and 55th years of emperor qianlong since he had set up his own academic system at that time 伴随着自己学术体系的建立和完善，他在乾隆五十四年、五十五年集中点名攻驳、评价戴震学术，一方面是针对当时学风病痛而发，另一方面，则有着完善自己的学术体系、推扬自己学术主张的目的。
It is believed by the author this paper that because the necessaries of integration and critique therefore dai zheng ' s wisdom and method is philosophy too , but , it is impossible that to rebuild on ontology by confucianism as the resources of intellect after him 本文认为：出于思想理论分疏和辨析尤其是学术论战的需要，戴震的学术思想、特别是通过经典诠释学所实现的他的学术思想的理论精华和思想贡献，仍然属于哲学范畴；但是，戴震哲学以后，以儒家学问为思想理论资源的道德的形上学的理论建构和思想实现已无可能。
Dai zheng had inherting from the past and working for the future with integrated method of classic when he has confronted toward the situation that confucianism is not only losing its efficiency but also song - ming neo - confucianism to murder with the rule , thus he integrated and distinguished ahout differentiation between wisdom and philosophy to come to an end of confucianism ' s philosophization 戴震直面儒学失却匡范人心、维系伦常的社会功能以致于宋明新儒学以理杀人的现实，延续儒学传统的经典诠释学的方法，从思想理论上分疏和辨析了儒学作为学问和作为哲学所具有的截然不同的社会功能和效应，从而提出和完成了终止儒学哲理化进程以回归其学问特质的历史性任务。
Dai zheng had inherting from the past and working for the future with integrated method of classic when he has confronted toward the situation that confucianism is not only losing its efficiency but also song - ming neo - confucianism to murder with the rule , thus he integrated and distinguished ahout differentiation between wisdom and philosophy to come to an end of confucianism ' s philosophization 戴震直面儒学失却匡范人心、维系伦常的社会功能以致于宋明新儒学以理杀人的现实，延续儒学常规的经典诠释学的方法，从思想理论上分疏和辨析了儒学作为学问和作为哲学所具有的截然不同的社会功能和效应，从而提出和完成了终止儒学哲理化进程以回归其学问特质的历史性任务。
