In the past years , the domain name of many brands of famous corporation were registered by others , which made them lose the good chances to show themselves and caused much economic losses 在过去的几年里，国内外大量著名企业的商标被他人在互联网上抢注为自己的域名，使企业失去了在互联网上顺利展示自己的机会，从而造成了巨大的经济损失。
But under the conditions of the e - business , the commercial function of domain name becomes prominent besides the technical function . the traditional legal system is challenged by the large amount of the domain name cybersquatting 其标识性和商业价值愈来愈被人们认可,随之出现了大量域名抢注纠纷,只靠目前的法律制度已不能很好地解决这一问题。
As for the register and management system of domain name , the popular way in international community is " earlier application , earlier register " but not substantial review on domain name register 更有一些人视域名为发财之机，大量抢注他人域名而后待价而沽，由此引发了许多争议；在域名的注册与管理机制方面，目前国际上通行的做法是“先申请先注册” ，并不对域名注册进行实质性审查。
The leak of the present law system results in the common happen of the conflict of right of traditional trade names , being anticipatory registered or free - rided , which damages the credit of traditional trade names and blocks the smooth development of traditional trade name enterprises 立法上的滞后造成老字号权利冲突、老字号被抢注、被“搭便车”等现象的普遍发生,严重损害了老字号的信誉,阻碍了老字号的健康发展。
Such unfair competitions in the electronic business practice as confusion of subject , goodwill infringement , trade secret infringement , preemptive registration of domain name and the monopolization in electronic business , has been preventing the electronic business cause from developing rapidly 电子商务实践中存在着诸如主体混同行为、商誉侵权、侵犯商业秘密、域名抢注以及垄断等不正当竞争行为，桎梏了电子商务的发展。
This thesis will take the present legislation in our country and the practical problems of traditional trade names as the research base , comparative analysis as the research method and make an approach on perfecting the law protection system of the traditional trade names 本文以我国现行老字号的相关立法现状和老字号权利冲突、老字号被抢注等现实问题为研究基点,以比较分析为研究方法,对完善我国老字号的法律保护制度做初步的探讨。
The trademark rights of famous trademark may extend to the domain name power , snatches the ordinary trademark the note on subjective exists hr the domain name intentionally when to constitute identically infringement trademark rights behavior , the coincidence , the non - commercial darn use , the domain name registration in , the reasonable use behavior does not encroach first the trademark rights 驰名商标的商标权可以延伸至域名权，将普通商标抢注为域名者主观上存在故意时构成侵犯商标权行为，巧合雷同、非商业性使用、域名注册在先、合理使用行为不侵犯商标权。
In the last chapter , some hot issues which is the ongoing rules of china which is insufficient , indefinite or nothing , such as the special protection of well - known trade marks , malicious registration of domain names , prior right and the liability principles of action for infringement of a mark , are probed here . and some ideas and suggestion are put forward to improve the system 文章最后一部分对我国现行法规范不够完善、或不太明确甚至阀如的热点问题，诸如驰名商标的特殊保护、域名抢注、在先权以及商标侵权行为的归责原则等进行了探讨，并提出了进一步完善这些制度的设想和见解，
Borrowing ideas from the solving models on conflicts between trade mark and domain name privileges in international community , we provide favourable legal system environment for the development of traditional conomy and cybereconomy by establishing valid domain name registration review mechanism 、 reasonably restricting rights of trademark obligees 、 forbidding reverse cyber - squatting conducts 、 citing the law of against unfair competition 、 and by establishing specialized agency solving conflicts on domain name 、 perfecting dissidence system and regarding whether “ malice ” as requisite important subjective document 在借鉴国际社会商标权与域名权冲突解决模式的基础上,从确立有效的域名注册审查制度、合理限制商标权人的权利、禁止反向域名抢注行为、援引反不正当竞争法、建立解决域名冲突的专门机构、完善异议制度以及把是否“恶意”作为必备的主观要件等方面解决问题,从而为传统经济和网络经济的发展提供良好的法制环境。
The article defines well - known trademark , demonstrates domain name ' s concept , nature , characteristics , relations between domain name and trademark , analyzes cyber squatting being indefinite by the way of jurisprudence and economics , discusses legal employment and legal remedy by the example of " dupont " case and points out several appropriate plan to the problem at last 本文从驰名商标的界定入手，论述了域名的含义、性质、特征，域名与商标之间的关系，从法理学和经济学两个角度分析了抢注行为的非正当性，结合杜邦案对这一问题的法律适用和法律救济进行了较为深入的探讨，最后提出了解决这一问题的若干对策。
