Substantial breach of contract is not a new or particularcontract breachin quality but just one form of the various beaches 根本违约与违约形态在性质上具有根本的不同，根本违约并非是一种新的违约形态。
It is a new style that the contractual law contains breach and fundamental breach of contracts that are belonging to english and american legal system 其中，将属于英美法系制度的预期违约，根本违约规定在合同法中，属于合同法全新的内容。
And whether such breach has led to the irrealization of the other party ' s legal contract destination , direct or indirect , is its final measurement 合同目的有直接目的与间接目的之分，无论是哪种目的不能实现，均可认定该违约行为构成根本违约
The legal system of substantial breach of contract has developed in an important world wide legal system since it came into being in britain 根本违约制度自其在英国普通法上产生以来，已发展成为世界各国合同法及国际统一合同法上的重要法律制度。
Simultaneously , it poses the mode of judgment that in the concrete practice of the rescission of contract the criterion to judge the fundamental breach of contract should be defined according to the specific breach forms 在合同解除的具体运用上，提出将根本违约的判断标准分解在具体的违约形态下进行判断的模式。
The contract law of china adopted two institutions which are peculiar in the system of anglo - american law : fundamental breach of contract and anticipatory breach of contract and established a perfect system of the lawful rescission of contract 我国统一合同法吸收了英美法系特有的根本违约制度和预期违约制度，建立了比较完善的合同法定解除制度。
The second part analyses how carrier " responsibility in advanced b / l , antidated b / l dissension , considers the behavior of advanced b / l , antidated b / l have not to constitute a tort . no likely to constitute a fundermental breach 第二部分具体分析了承运人在预借、倒签提单纠纷中的责任，认为预借、倒签提单行为不必然构成侵权，也不太可能构成根本违约。
With the difficulties to distinguish such two kind terms , the britain court gradually practiced to affirm a substantial breach by the practical harms . part descibes its basic theory 由于区分条件与担保非常困难，英国法院逐步形成了以违约后果的严重程度来判断是否构成根本违约，纵观当今世界各国合同法及国际立法，基本上均以违约后果的严重性来区分根本违约与非根本违约。
This paper historically describes its coparation with contrct breach and exposes its nature and constituive requierments , legalization standards , legal consequence and its valie . and the whole paper consists six parts , totaled over 32 , 000 words 本论文通过对根本违约制度进行历史的比较的考察，逻辑结构的分析，充分提示了根本违约的实质内涵、构成要件、判断标准、法律效果及价值取向。
Substential breach of a contract reflects the wanton trample on the principle of contract abiding - by , which will destoy benefits from the contract , the bad deed that will endanger the market credit ; what is worse is that that will endanger the trade security 第二部分，根本违约之基础理论。根本违约的本质在于该违约行为粗暴践踏了合同信原则，从而永久性破坏了合同利益关系，危及了市场信用制度，进而危害交易安全。
