Beginning with setting forth origination , basis in theory of law and characteristic of rule of corroboration , it explores emphatically the content of the rule in which the meaning , scope , ability of evidence , provable value of corroboration and the range objects of rule of corroboration are elaborated 文章首先对补强证据规则的历史起源、确立的法理依据和补强证据规则的特征进行了简要的阐述，接着着重对补强证据规则的内容进行了探讨。其中对补强证据的含义、范围、证据能力、证明力以及补强证据规则的适用范围和对象都作了详细的论述。
Relevance is the heart of the former that includes relevance rules , explanation and restriction rules of relevance . the latter rely on the procedural regulations and is the main part of the system of admissibility rules which stipulate the admissibility of evidence from the aspects such as qualification , the mode and the occasion of the production of evidence . the application of admissibility rules includes the stage and the method to identify the admissible evidence 证据能力的静态规范以关联性为核心，包括关联性规则和对关联性的解释与限制规则，证据能力的动态规则是证据能力规则体系的主要部分，它以程序法为依托，从证据提出的主体资格、方式、时间方面对证据的可采性进行规范。
The scientific substance lies in the scientific principle that expertise is based on , the basic requirements for authentication materials , as well as the scientific methods and measures in authentication ; the legal substance mainly concludes the acceptance of evidence and the value of evidence 鉴定结论的科学性体现于其所依据的科学原理，鉴定对象所应具备的基本条件以及鉴定方法手段的科学性上；而对鉴定结论的合法性内容则主要是从其证据能力和证明力这两大属性加以阐述。
The principle abolished the prescribed rule which restrict judge on judging evidence and leaved evidence valuing entirely to judge ' s logos . but logos have characters of universality and particularity . to avoid valuing evidence personally , it ' s essential to build a restrict system 程序性性制约的制度包括证据能力制度、证明标准、判断理由公开制度以及上诉制度;法官制度即主体性制约的制度，则包括严格的法官任职资格、法官的终身制与高薪制、法官弹幼制度以及法官回避制度、合议制、多级审级制。
The anglo - american countries respond to the challenge with the assertion that the inadmissible evidence should be excluded before it comes to the court . conversely , the continental countries insist on exclude inadmissible evidence gradually through the going - on of the proceedings . both of the methods have their own advantages 英美法系国家在证据能力规则的适用程序上坚持不具有可采性的证据必须在法院开庭审理前予以排除，大陆法系国家则强调通过诉讼持续渐进地排除不具有证据能力之证据。
The former is determined by legality of authenticating corpus , resources of authentication materials and procedure of authentication , necessity for authenticating as well . while the value of expertise is influenced by many factors , among which the relation between expertise and facts of a case , as well as relation between expertise and other evidences in a case are mainly discussed here 其中，鉴定结论的证据能力决定于其鉴定主体的合法性、鉴定资料来源和鉴定系列程序的合法性，还牵涉到理论性很强的鉴定的必要性问题；而影响鉴定结论证明力的因素很多，在此主要是从鉴定结论与案件事实的关联程度，以及鉴定结论与案内其他证据的相互关系两方面考虑。
Because of the disadvantages in logic , explanation and ideology , the nature of evidence system can not works well in judicial practice . on the other hand , the competence of evidence rules has many advantages in act field , flexibility and ideology , which make the substitution of the former possible 但是，由于在逻辑上、内涵上以及所代表的思维定式上存在着许多的问题，证据的属性制度难以在实践中发挥实际作用，而证据能力制度则在作用的范围、灵活性和思维方式等方面显示出明显的优势，这为证据能力制度代替证据属性制度提供了可能。
