The arguments concentrate on two aspects primarily , one is whether the defense ’ s limit should be included in the concept of justifiable defense or not , the other is whether justifiable defense must do harm to the people who infringe the law or not . about the first question , someone oppose nominally and consider that the defense ’ s limit should not appear in the literal statement of the concept of justifiable defense , others oppose substantively and consider that the defense ’ s limit is not the element of justifiable defense and excessive defense should be bring into category of justifiable defense . in my opinion , the former standpoint apprehends the legal rules of justifiable defense solely and not associate with the legal rules of excessive defense 本文认为:防卫限度条件应当纳入正当防卫的概念,损害性不是正当防卫的必然要求;正当防卫是由人的自我防卫这一自然权利接受法律的洗礼以后形成的法定权利,自然权利属性和阶级性都是正当防卫的正当化根据;正当防卫中的不法侵害包括紧迫的犯罪或者违法行为,不法侵害中的“不法”是主客观相统一的不法;正当防卫的主观条件是基于对不法侵害的认识而决意实施防卫行为的心态,特定的防卫目的不是正当防卫的主观条件。
