This is this article major idea . nozick ’ s theory come forth unaccidentally . in 20th century , it has unfolded the platform which many questions requests answers ? ? the enlighten is right or is wrong 当诺齐克置身于福利主义时代,他既要面对功利主义的权利观,又要回应罗尔斯的福利权利观。
Nuoqike had said that the principle of justice of rawls was only results , is the model of the principles , yet the principle of the entitlement theory was a historical justice , non - modular principle 诺齐克指出,罗尔斯的正义原则是结果正义,是模式化的原则,而自己的权利原则是历史正义,是非模式化原则。
Just a moment , aim at the justice problem , a vigorous contestation was launched among the egalitarianism representative by rawls and rights thesis representative by nozick and communitarianism representative by maclntyre 一时间，就公正问题，以罗尔斯为代表的平等主义公正思想与以诺齐克为代表的权利论公正思想以及以麦金太尔等人为代表的社群主义公正思想之间展开了激烈的论争。
In this book nozick discusses his distinctive understanding not only on the state " s origin , but also on function and magnetism of state , explaining how the state - of - nature turned into a state by the " invisible - hand explanations " ; by criticizing the theory of rawls , he demonstrates that no state more extensive than " the minimal state " can be justified ; by depicting a framework for utopia he exhibites the luster of state 无论是对国家起源、国家功能，还是国家理想，诺齐克都提出了自己独特的见解：通过一种“看不见的手的解释”来论述自然状态转变为国家的过程、通过批判罗尔斯等的理论来说明没有什么比“最弱意义国家”功能更多的国家能够得到证明、通过描述“一种用于乌托邦的结构”来解决国家的可欲性问题。
We can attains some conclusions in this paper , nozick emphasizes the rightness of property holding and historic justification of the origin of property , rawls highlights on the right of equality and cares for people who live in inferior position . nozick stresses the ownership of natural development of property " holding " and advocates the theory of " the minimal state " . in order to arrive at goals of social justice and good , rawls tries to reduce the gap in social and natural chanciness , and insists on the redistribution of property under the interposition of the public reason and public power 我们可以获得一些结论：诺齐克看重财产持有的正当性和财产来源的历史意义，罗尔斯则按照“两个正义原则”对公共资源进行分配并关怀弱势群体；诺齐克强调财富“持有”的自然生成的所有权并主张干预财富分配的“最弱意义国家”理论，罗尔斯则试图减轻自然和社会“偶性”方面的差距，强调通过公共理性和公共权力来干预财产的分配和再分配，以期达到社会的公正与善。
Part3 , the author studies the morality of market economy specifically . analyzing several typical viewpoints of distributive justice : rawls " substantive justice , nozick ' s procedural ( right ) justice . hayek ' s rules ( procedural ) justice - a natural order , communitarianism ' s viewpoints of distributive justice , habermas " " procedural justice " and confucian ' s hierarchical justice , the author argues that we should pay more attention to the distributive justice theories of rawls and communitarians , and weaken the influence of confucian tradition and try to find a procedure agreeing with justice and its steps 笔者首先考察了几种典型的分配正义观点：罗尔斯实质正义的分配正义观、诺齐克程序(权利)正义的分配正义观、哈耶克规则(程序)正义的自发秩序观、 “社群主义”的分配正义观、哈贝马斯的“程序的正义”观以及先秦儒家的“礼义差等”的分配正义观，接着提出我们主要以罗尔斯和“社五包b飞石6臣ik个于wniasfur ’ si ” iiesis群主义”理论为主要参考，尽量弱化传统的不利影响，寻求一个合乎正义的程序及正义程序执行步骤。
