wikipedi造句

• If that is so, wikipedi ahould not present one side of a dispute as unquestioned fact, but rather should indicate that there are differnign opnions, who holds them, and what evidence each side cites in support of its view.
• I've decided to try editing myself since I'm now co-hosting a meeting this spring with the Wikimedia Foundation on museum staff involved in editing wikipedi and have been feeling that I should at least have done it once.
• I think that despite the effort she puts into Wikipedi, she often gets rather shabby treatment here . . . . such as the disrespectful statement you just made about her . talk ) 22 : 20, 18 September 2008 ( UTC ) 
• Regardless, the fact remains that there are many ways to prove that Ian Erix is a notable person who should be more than qualified to have a Wikipedi aarticle on him and numerous sources to prove such have been sited in his page before the revisions were made by user Drmies.
• :If you wish to contribute articles to the English Wikipedi about Urdu literature, it would be a good idea to use the Articles for creation process set out at WP : AFC . If you want to contribute in Urdu, there is an talk ) 19 : 42, 1 July 2013 ( UTC)
• This was a request put out to start articles especially if it had a photo It does conform to Wikipedi's s as it has encompassed these three . ( Wikipedia : Neutral point of view, Wikipedia : Verifiability, and Wikipedia : No original research ) What seems to be the issue here is Wikipedia : Notability ( organizations and companies ).
• I am also suggesting that a new article on scars be created so that new break thorughs in the medical world so that major breakthroughs like the one about the extracellular matrix can be incorporated into wikipedi and will be recognized and will give hope to millions upon millions of people who read the wikipedia article on scars and think that scar removal is impossible and give up hope.
• For example, when writing the word " WIKIPEDIA ", ( I tend to always print in capital block letters and never use cursive, the reason for which is a whole other story for a whole different question ) although I'd usually get it right, an unusual number of times I'd look at the page and see : " IKIPEDIA " or " WIKIPEDI ".
• :: : : : I think there's already a day to appreciate the Wikipedi " a ", what I'm proposing is a day to appreciate the cogs in the machine, the Wikipedi " ans " : ) All that remains is to pick a day and to wait for it, then . . . Dysprosia 06 : 00, 14 Mar 2004 ( UTC)
• :: : : : I think there's already a day to appreciate the Wikipedi " a ", what I'm proposing is a day to appreciate the cogs in the machine, the Wikipedi " ans " : ) All that remains is to pick a day and to wait for it, then . . . Dysprosia 06 : 00, 14 Mar 2004 ( UTC)
• :: : Also note that I have made many contributions that aren't related with Balkans articles, so I don't need time to learn or to demonstrate my competence ( I have read Wikipedi's rules recently and I have done many contructive editings the recent days in both balkans related and non related articles ) . I am using the talk page now, as you can see in my recent history, I am not and will not make edit warring or anything else in the future . The only thing I need is a last chance, not a topic block . talk ) 15 : 36, 17 July 2015 ( UTC)
• :: : Also note that I have made many contributions that aren't related with Balkans articles, so I don't need time to learn or to demonstrate my competence ( I have read Wikipedi's rules recently and I have done many contructive editings the recent days in both balkans related and non related articles ) . I am using the talk page now, as you can see in my recent history, I am not and will not make edit warring or anything else in the future . The only thing I need is a last chance, not a topic block . talk ) 07 : 15, 18 July 2015 ( UTC)