wikipedi造句

• The information on wikipedi is a neutral, unbiased point of view.
• Like Wikipedi : WikiProject Conspiracy : The London bombing Conspiracy dude or something?
• Most of this stuff is already in wikipedi.
• This is also cited ( and locked ! ) in Lupita Nyong'o's Wikipedi article.
• Wikipedi, ideally, is always accurate . talk ) 12 : 26, 3 September 2008 ( UTC)
• I don't know how all this works on Wikipedi, but I tried changing it and pissed your editors off.
• For that reason, I would prefer a moderator knowledgable about the issue or similar issues but not among the Turkish Wikipedi moderators.
• The two main articles I've created so far on Wikipedi are the plastic flamingos article and the Ihab al-Sherif articles.
• With the upload file tool, it is possible that a group of people arrange to exchange files like music illegally on the Wikipedi servers.
• That would obviously take a lot of space, but storage volume never seems to be a problem anymore ( just look at Wikipedi ! ).
• The evidence ( in wikipedia ) is very clear : RolandR and Elaland opreate as a group to push EI sources and POV into wikipedi articles.
• At the current time this politician does not meets Wikipedi's inclusion standards . alk to me ! 02 : 58, 30 November 2008 ( UTC)
• I realize Wikipedi is on a fund-raising mission, and the budget for 2011-2012 is something like a 24 % increase over this year.
• Might as well derive an income from it that can build an even better Wikipedi !  Preceding talk ) 00 : 45, 29 November 2011 ( UTC)
• Also, putting domain name qualifiers in front of wikipedi . org ( eg gazetter . wikipedia . org ) only gives us a single dimnsion of meta-data.
• The FSM has been mentioned a lot on the internet lately, and Wikipedi is ( and IMO'should'be ) an obvious place to come for more information.
• If these verifying materials are not available online, I suggest taking the same information I have just requested to either Wikipedi : WikiProject Medicine or Wikipedia : WikiProject Australia to request assistance.
• As to the first, and if I remember correctly, the original license used when submitting text to wikipedi was the GFDL, which does not bar commercial use of the text.
• What you are saying is that Wikipedi users need to be " protected " from the evil site by having it all explained to them in nice, safe black and white text.
• Why would we ask him again when he's proven that he doesn't want the article by deleting entries as they were posted, discounting a credible source like Jerry Avenaim himself listed as notable on Wikipedi?