政府垄断

• Through the analysis of the theoretic presupposition and forming background of the traditional operation mode of local governments ’ public utility , this paper dissects the reasonableness and disadvantages of our country ’ s traditional government - monopolizing mode of public utility . what ’ s more , it holds that the construction of market - based operating mode of public utility should pick and choose reasonableness from the traditional operation mode , and get rid of the malpractice gradually
  通过对地方政府公共事业传统运作模式的理论预设以及形成背景的分析,本文剖析了中国公共事业领域传统的政府垄断经营模式的合理性和局限性,并认为新的公共事业市场运作模式的构建应该是对传统管理模式的合理扬弃,继承传统模式的合理成分并逐步消除其弊端。
• In reality , because of the inertia thinking of the all - round country , there is very strong administrative color in the modern operation of the third sector . the monopoly of the government still exists in public articles and the service field , there is no normal and high - efficient its doing in public resource distribution of full play in the third sector
  在现实中,由于全能国家的惯性思维,中国第三部门的运行带有很强的行政色彩,在公共物品和服务领域中政府垄断依然存在,第三部门没有正常和高效的发挥它在公共资源配置过程中的作用。
• Those in our country in planned economy times easily lead to financial crisis . the westerms ’ public services reformation gives us a new way , it according to the market value direction , introducing competition and price mechanism , breaking the monopoly by the government , depending on working together of the government 、 market and the third sector
  西方公共服务改革浪潮给我们提供了解决这一难题的思路:公共服务市场化,即按照市场化的价值取向,引入竞争和价格机制,打破政府垄断,尽可能的依靠政府、市场、第三部门三者共同作用。
• First , this dissertation raises the three operation modes of public utility : the traditional government - monopolizing mode , market - based operating mode and social self - organizing mode , and gives detailed analysis on the theme of this paper ? ? the market - based operating mode of public utility from the aspects of essence , characteristics and formation
  本文首先提出公共事业领域存在三种运作模式:传统的政府垄断经营模式、市场运作模式以及社会自组织运作模式,并对本文探讨的主题? ?公共事业市场运作模式从本质、特征及构成等方面进行了较为详细的分析。
• With the development of our market economy , the rise of the third sector and the character of public services themselves , it is possible to introduce the competition mechanism into the public services . in fact , the public services function pattern of our government is changing . the old monopoly pattern by the government is broken gradually and the new competition pattern is in practice or in probe
  随着我国市场经济的发展，第三部门的兴起以及公共服务本身的特性，这一切都使得政府公共服务中引入竞争机制成为可能。事实上，我国政府公共服务职能模式正在发生转变，传统的政府垄断模式正逐渐在打破，市场竞争模式正在逐步实践和探索中。
• We take it as a result of introspection : facing the market malfuction , government failure and civil society arising , we not only need introspect the reasonable and legitimacy of previous governmental behaviors , but the re - location of future governmental value , role and functions in polycentri governance
  我们把这种重新诠释和变革作为一种反思的结果：面对市场失灵、政府失效、公民社会的兴起，我们不仅要反思以往政府垄断行为的合理性和合法性，还要反思未来政府在多中心治道中价值、角色以及功能的重新定位问题。
• The primary causes of the regime shortage are the state monopoly and the state control over the education . the primary cause of the structure shortage is that the budgetary appropriations are not in favor of the compulsory education and the underdeveloped district . then this article puts forward some suggestion to alleviant these kinds of educational shortage : to raise the repay of human capital ; to initiate a system of public financial regulation ; to increase the government appropriation for education ; to relax the state control over education ; to improve the form of the financial transference expenditure , and so on
  总量性短缺的成因主要是我国人口多、经济发展水平低，教育投资资本边际效率递减趋势、教育投资预期收益相对偏低等；财政性短缺的主要成因是在国家加快推进工业化特别是优先发展重工业的战略下，政府财政支出的重点必然倾向物质生产部门，而近二十年的财政制度创新都因利益格局的刚性只能作有限突破等；体制性短缺的成因主要是政府垄断阻碍各类要素往教育领域的流入等；结构性短缺的成因主要是分级分权拨款体制无法保证教育投资的公平等。
• The conclusion is that in china ' s stock market , there is statistically evident evidence to prove that there is intrinsic bubble caused by dividends or information about dividends . some other factors may result in stock market bubble in china , such as investors , market manipulation , government intervention , listed company and disclosure of information
  本论文还讨论了其它有可能引起我国股市泡沫的原因，其中包括：投资者结构、市场操纵行为、政府垄断力量的干预、上市公司质量、信息披露不充分、投资者风险意识差及股权结构不完善等