Following the english empiricist francis bacon , popper as a critical rationalist who first studied the problem and made it profound 批判理性主义者波普尔是继近代英国经验论者f培根之后第一个对此问题作深入探讨的现代哲学家。
Historically , a cornerstone of classical empiricism has been the notion that every true generalization must be confirmable by specific observations 历史上，经典经验论立基于此一观念之上：每个真实的归纳命题必须能被个别观察所证实。
Hume thought that the mechanism involved the basis of human nature and epistemology , the existence of ego , the likeness of body and mind structure and the basis of experiential observation 他认为同情的发生有人性论的依据、认识论的基础，有自我的存在、人类身体结构和心灵结构的相似性及经验论方面的依据。
To think that knowledge can stop at the lower , perceptual stage and that perceptual knowledge alone is reliable while rational knowledge is not , would be to repeat the historical error of " empiricism " 如果以为认识可以停顿在低级的感性阶段，以为只有感性认识可靠，而理性认识是靠不住的，这便是重复了历史上的“经验论”的错误。
In classical empiricism , the truth of “ all balls are red , ” for example , is assessed by inspecting balls ; any observation of a non red ball refutes unequivocally the proposed generalization 在经典经验论中，诸如“所有的球都是红色”这类命题的真实性都通过对球的观察而受到评判。所观察到的任何一个非红色球都会毫不含糊地否定曾经提出的归纳命题。
Conceptual systems can be broadly classified as being either objectivistic or experiential in nature . of these , objectivism represents the traditional and experientialism represents contemporary positions of cognitive science 概念系统在本质上，可宽泛地分为经验论和客观论。其中，客观论代表传统认知科学的立场，而经验论代表当代认知科学的立场。
Conceptual systems can be broadly classified as being either objectivistic or experiential in nature . of these , objectivism represents the traditional and experientialism represents contemporary positions of cognitive science 在本质上，概念系统可宽泛地分为经验论和客观论。其中，客观论代表传统认知科学的立场，而经验论代表当代认知科学的立场。
Although my assertion , " no investigation , no right to speak " , has been ridiculed as " narrow empiricism " , to this day i do not regret having made it ; far from regretting it , i still insist that without investigation there cannot possibly be any right to speak “没有调查就没有发言权” ，这句话，虽然曾经被人讥为“狭隘经验论”的，我却至今不悔；不但不悔，我仍然坚持没有调查是不可能有发言权的。
Conventional feminist and social psychological explanations for the genesis of gender roles ? girls and boys are “ taught ” appropriate behaviors and ‘ learn ” appropriate feelings - are insufficient both empirically and methodologically to account for how women become mothers 传统的女性主义和社会心理学对性别角色的起源是这样解释的? ?女孩和男孩被教给合理的行为方式并且学会合理的感觉，这种说法不论在经验论还是方法论上都未能充分说明女人何以成为母亲。
In philosophy , neither " rationalism " nor " empiricism " understands the historical or the dialectical nature of knowledge , and although each of these schools contains one aspect of the truth ( here i am referring to materialist , not to idealist , rationalism and empiricism ) , both are wrong on the theory of knowledge as a whole 哲学上的“唯理论”和“经验论”都不懂得认识的历史性或辩证性，虽然各有片面的真理（对于唯物的唯理论和经验论而言，非指唯心的唯理论和经验论） ，但在认识论的全体上则都是错误的。
