Considering provision of the criminal law and the late judicial interpretation and based on criminal principal , the author asserts reasonably the 8 circumstances of crime calling for a heavier punishment under the provision of the article 263 and provides theories of crime of robbery that can be taken advantage of in practice 三、抢劫罪的量刑情节笔者结合刑法规定和最新司法解释，从刑法原理出发，科学论证了第263条规定的8种法定加重处罚情节，为司法操作提供了可供参考的理论依据。
In introduction , the author of the paper brings forward the problem of the research about circumstances of sentencing on the basis of promoting fair sentencing and points out that circumstances of sentencing play an important role in realizing the ideal state of balance between crime and punishment regarding criminal law legality . the introduction , based on a brief analysis of the current application and study on circumstances of sentencing , reveals the theoretic significance and practice value of research about circumstances of sentencing 引言,以促进量刑公正为契机提出了量刑情节的研究这一课题,指出量刑情节在实现罪刑均衡这一刑法法制理想状态方面的重要作用,同时在简要分析量刑情节的适用现实和研究现状的基础上,揭示了量刑情节研究的实践和理论意义。
According to the principle of " the synthetic distribution of punishment " , the author poses the concept of " the circumstance of distribution of punishment " , and taking the error making method , compares the " robbery of housebreaking " with there circumstances : the criminate , the sentencing , and the distribution of punishment , it is conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " should not be regarded as the circumstances of crime or the sentencing discretion , even though there are some barriers in the theory conclusions as a circumstance of distribution of punishment , so we can conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " can not be considered as the legal circumstances , it must be the circumstance of distribution of punishment even if it is regarded as the legal circumstances . in the process of jurist and legislation , we must strictly grasp the approval standards of the " house " , recognize and deploy the legal sentence of " robbery of housebreaking " correctly , 根据“统一配刑论”的原理，笔者提出了“配刑情节”的概念，并采取归谬法，将“入户抢劫”同时置于定罪、量刑、配刑三种语境下进行比较，得出“入户抢劫”既不应该是犯罪情节，也不可能是量刑情节，作为配刑情节也存在理论障碍的结论，进一步推断出“入户抢劫”不应该作为法定情节，即使作为法定情节也应该是配刑情节的结论，而且在司法和立法中应从严把握“户”的认定标准，正确认识和配置“入户抢劫”的法定刑，防止罪刑失衡，还对具体案件和审判实践中要解决的几个问题提供了参考方案。
