calad造句

• Mr . Calad served with distinction for twelve years before retiring.
• Ms Calad had sued CIGNA for damages.
• Calad left the hospital, suffered complications and returned several days later to the emergency room.
• Mrs . Calad, following discharge, experienced post-surgery complications, for which she had to be emergently readmitted to the hospital.
• In the other case, Cigna HealthCare of Texas Inc . v . Calad, No . 03-83, Ruby Calad had a hysterectomy along with other surgical procedures.
• In the other case, Cigna HealthCare of Texas Inc . v . Calad, No . 03-83, Ruby Calad had a hysterectomy along with other surgical procedures.
• The second principal, Herman Calad, met the challenge of bringing WHS into the 20th century while facing ever-shrinking budgets and increasing pressure to produce high standardized test scores.
• Although the coverage under her husband's health-care plan, provided by Cigna, specified a one-day hospital stay for a hysterectomy, Calad's surgeon recommended a longer stay.
• Mrs . Calad was discharged home the day following the surgery, despite the fact the surgeon who performed the surgery felt that Mrs . Calad needed more time in the hospital to convalesce from the surgery.
• Mrs . Calad was discharged home the day following the surgery, despite the fact the surgeon who performed the surgery felt that Mrs . Calad needed more time in the hospital to convalesce from the surgery.
• In other words, Ms Calad and Mr . Davila might have prevented the damage to their person for which they are allowed no monetary damages in court if they had properly enforced their ERISA or THCLA rights against CIGNA and Aetna to prevent the injury from happening.
• For instance, in 1223, one Gregory, son of Calad, who had stolen the chapter's 150 sheep, not only returned them, but also mortgaged his estate named " Chereuy " to secure his compensation for the damages that he had done.
• The biggest distinguishing factor from " Pilot Life " in the case of " CIGNA v . Calad " was the fact that it was too late for ERISA's powerful injunctive remedies to benefit the Respondents, who had already suffered damages for which equitable relief could not compensate them for their loss or suffering.
• The facts that had been established and were in the record for purposes of the Supreme Court decision were that Mrs . Calad had had a hysterectomy in a CIGNA-approved Hospital, and as Administrator of Mr . Calad's employer's health plan, a CIGNA nurse had preapproved 1 night's hospital stay for the procedure.
• The facts that had been established and were in the record for purposes of the Supreme Court decision were that Mrs . Calad had had a hysterectomy in a CIGNA-approved Hospital, and as Administrator of Mr . Calad's employer's health plan, a CIGNA nurse had preapproved 1 night's hospital stay for the procedure.
• Mr . Calad's company medical plan was funded by his private employer but " Administered " by CIGNA, in an " HMO "-type option, which was on its face one of the most advantageous of several plans offered by Mr . Calad's employer, with the lowest monthly premiums and the lowest co-pays for medical services.
• Mr . Calad's company medical plan was funded by his private employer but " Administered " by CIGNA, in an " HMO "-type option, which was on its face one of the most advantageous of several plans offered by Mr . Calad's employer, with the lowest monthly premiums and the lowest co-pays for medical services.
• "' CIGNA v . Calad "'was a Supreme Court of the United States appeal and ruling, where CIGNA Healthcare, Inc . challenged a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruling in favor of Mrs . Ruby Calad, who was insured under her husband's employer's self-funded medical insurance plan in the State of Texas.
• "' CIGNA v . Calad "'was a Supreme Court of the United States appeal and ruling, where CIGNA Healthcare, Inc . challenged a United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruling in favor of Mrs . Ruby Calad, who was insured under her husband's employer's self-funded medical insurance plan in the State of Texas.
• CIGNA and Aetna both pointed out in oral arguments what has been referred to in ERISA's judicial history as the " Panoply " of remedies that Calad and Davila might have evoked under ERISA to prevent the damage suffered, to include appeals of the adverse decisions, judicial Injunction to compel Utilization Review to approve treatment, and a new Texas law that allowed for independent arbitration over Managed Care Utilization Review decisions based on Medical necessity.