illegit造句

• Some held signs that read, " Bush is illegit ."
• The talk is of real-estate deals, illegit assignations, weekends in Vegas.
• See WP : ILLEGIT especially the "'circumventing policies or sanctions "'part.
• WP : ILLEGIT is irrelevant because the Former Account template informs users that the accounts are related.
• This is a violation of WP : ILLEGIT's " Creating an illusion of support ".
• But there is no doubt in my mind this is WP : ILLEGIT one way or another.
• I know now that I was in violation of WP : ILLEGIT, if not the ban.
• This clearly violates WP : ILLEGIT . talk ) 16 : 12, 18 June 2011 ( UTC)
• Seems like the user is using a sock to back up his own argument per WP : ILLEGIT.
• And disagree on whether Colton's editing constitutes a form of sockpuppetry ( WP : ILLEGIT ).
• I don't see violations of WP : ILLEGIT . ( S ) he would not be the 1st editor to return after ditching an account.
• According to WP : ILLEGIT, you're not supposed to be editing the same article with more than one account unless they are clearly linked.
• I suspect they are the same person and if so, they are using different accounts to back up themself, which is unacceptable ( WP : ILLEGIT ).
• Being illegit would be a massive burden in the upper classes, but in the lower classes it would be common, so not as big of a deal.
• When I read WP : ILLEGIT, the use of multiple accounts is prohibited, especially when it prevents other editors from connecting various edits done by the same person.
• Per WP : ILLEGIT-used for circumventing policies or sanctions, specifically WP : EVASION of username block to recreat talk ) 04 : 54, 9 April 2012 ( UTC)
• Even if his unbelievable notion has to be taken in account, that his brother helped him in wiki matters, he has intentionally violated WP : ILLEGIT for more than 5 years.
• :: : Since you've mentioned the original uploader of the image who seems to have mysteriously disappeared, have you also read WP : ILLEGIT and / or WP : PANICVOTE?
• It would be deceiving to believe on your malformed one-sided fairytales after all, especially when you have admitted history of abusing WP : ILLEGIT on many namespaces, including this article.
• The IPs have also been used in a way that could be given an allusion of support ( WP : ILLEGIT ) at Talk : Tea bag ( disambiguation ) and the article in question.