quicumque造句

• Following a thread above, I noticed a denied Quicumque vult " "'15 : 36, 18 June 2009 ( UTC)
• Did you ask someone else to create the article, perhaps through Quicumque vult " "'22 : 10, 27 June 2009 ( UTC)
• Feel free to return here, or take up a complaint at Quicumque vult " "'14 : 40, 7 July 2009 ( UTC)
• Afterwards, he declares : " " Sic deinde, quicumque alius transiliet moenia mea " " ( " So is it with anyone who leaps over my walls " ).
• :: In addition to the link above about conflict of interest, it is also helpful to read Quicumque vult " "'01 : 23, 20 June 2009 ( UTC)
• :: Looking through the last 1000 contribs, it appears that a pretty thorough cleanup has been done already . "'Quicumque vult " "'14 : 51, 18 June 2009 ( UTC)
• I will help to comb through the contribs and make sure it has all been undone, but is there anything else ? "'Quicumque vult " "'14 : 44, 18 June 2009 ( UTC)
• The crossguard bears the following Latin inscription : " Quicumque hec / nomina Deii secum tu / lerit nullum periculum / ei omnino nocebit " ( " Whoever will carry these names of God with him, no danger will harm him " ).
• Specifically, he appears to be saying that the article, in particular the sections with the tags, need additional citations, and without the citations they seem to represent either Quicumque vult " "'19 : 53, 14 July 2009 ( UTC)
• :: : : : There are still some French words that have it, indirectly, like jusqu'?( from usque, which was itself ubisque in very archaic Latin ), or quiconque ( from quicumque, qui + cumque, itself cum + enclitic-que ).
• Just make sure that it is some one univolved, and post a thread reminding that the talk page is to discuss article improvement, and that anything else ( personal views, etc ) can be removed at any time . "'Quicumque vult " "'17 : 08, 9 June 2009 ( UTC)