ratramnus造句
- Contrary positions were taken by Paschasius Radbertus and Ratramnus.
- In the ninth century, Hrabanus Maurus and Ratramnus also defended Augustine's view of nonmetabolic real presence.
- When Charles the Bald visited Corbie in 843, he apparently met Ratramnus and requested an explanation of the Eucharist.
- It was especially influential in England, where Thomas Cranmer claimed to have been finally convinced against transubstantion by Ratramnus.
- Ratramnus wrote two treatises on the soul, upholding traditional Fly Abbey that all human beings participate in a universal soul.
- In " The Book on the Soul ", Ratramnus argued that a soul cannot be universal, only individual.
- It was to the emperor, then, that Ratramnus addressed his work, also entitled " De corpore et sanguine Domini ".
- Berengar and Ratramnus accused their opponents, who believed in a real change of physical substance as opposed to a spiritual one, of stercoranism.
- Ratramnus wrote another treatise, " The Birth of Christ ", possibly as a response to Paschasius " De Partu Virginis ".
- The earliest signs of a new thought appeared in the ninth century during the discussions relative to the Last Supper ( Paschasius Radbertus, Ratramnus, Rabanus Maurus ).
- It's difficult to see ratramnus in a sentence. 用ratramnus造句挺难的
- Ratramnus used the same two terms ( " figura " and " veritas " ) to describe the Eucharist as Paschasius, but used them differently.
- Additionally, Ratramnus wrote an odd " Letter on the Dog-headed Creatures ", dissenting from the commonly held belief that the mythical cynocephali were animals.
- In this work, Ratramnus defended the idea that Christ s birth from the Virgin Mary occurred in the natural human way, so as to not detract from Christ s real human nature.
- Three of Corbie's ninth-century scholars were Ratramnus ( died " c " . 868 ), Radbertus Paschasius ( died 865 ) and the shadowy figure of Hadoard.
- This was intended as an introduction to a tract against transubstantiation by Ratramnus, of which English translations had appeared in 1548 and 1582, and another, by William Guild, came out in 1624.
- His doctrine was sharply attacked by Ratramnus and Rabanus Maurus, who opposed his emphatic realism, which was sometimes marred by unfortunate comparisons and illustrations, and proposed a more spiritual conception of the Divine presence.
- Ratramnus held that the body of Christ was present spiritually ( " spiritualiter " ) but not physically ( " corporaliter " ), while Paschasius emphasized the true presence of the body of Christ.
- In response, Ratramnus composed the two-book work " On the Predestination of God " ( " De Praedestinatione Dei " ), in which he defended double predestination, while objecting to the relation of predestination to sin.
- In 851, John Scotus Eriugena was commissioned to oppose Gottschalk s teaching, but his work, " Treatise on Divine Predestination ", essentially denied any form of predestination whatsoever, a denial which raised the ire of Ratramnus and Florus of Lyon.
- In this book, Ratramnus advocated a spiritual view in which the bread and the wine of the Eucharist represent Christ s body and blood figuratively and serve as a remembrance of him, but are not truly ( perceptible by the senses ) Christ s body and blood in truth.