unaccept造句

• Will editors be diligently accepting revisions ( I tend to agree that unaccept has no purpose )?
• :: : : I tried your link and this time the " unaccept " button is greyed.
• How come sometimes the Unaccept button is grayed out and only the Accept button is possible to choose?
• :The unaccept button is for when someone else accepted it, and you want it to be unaccepted.
• "I know from friends at other hospitals in New York and other cities that that would be unaccept-able, " said Shields.
• Also, the pending changes tab would only let me hit the unaccept button .-- talk ) 18 : 48, 20 July 2010 ( UTC)
• In other words, if someone unaccepts b / c of vandalism, instead of the log showing " revert ", it should show " unaccept ".
• There are usability issues, but most of them have already been mentioned above like the weird name of the pending changes page and the confusing and largely-pointless Unaccept button.
• For example-if I want to undo the action of an Accepted edit, I will not " unaccept " it ( ugh ! ), I will put it again as Pending.
• "The ( expletive ) worm has turned, " said Torre, who had been promised by the network that it would delete any language his sister the nun might find unaccept-able.
• :Further to this, by keeping the " unaccept " I can see a situation whereby an editor will " unaccept " an IP edit and leave the page at that knowing that the edit won't be seen.
• :Further to this, by keeping the " unaccept " I can see a situation whereby an editor will " unaccept " an IP edit and leave the page at that knowing that the edit won't be seen.
• I had expected that a change made by another editor was waiting for me to either accept or not-accept the edit but was presented with only a way to unaccept it ( the particular edit had already been accepted, but I didn't realise that at the time ).
• Although we should get the Accept / Unaccept buttons fixed, since, while I did work out how to use them without having to ask, it did confuse me at first, and it's not really that intuitive . talk ) 22 : 20, 25 June 2010 ( UTC)
• He then reverted me and while I don't have a problem with someone reverting an edit I made that for example violated Wikipedia policy, I don't think it is right when he says " " dont are-add unsouirced material go source it otherwise yopur edit is unaccept " " [ " sic " ! notice the spelling ].