vasoepididymostomy造句

• For a vasectomy reversal that involves a vasoepididymostomy, there are two microsurgical approaches.
• The case for vasoepididymostomy is different.
• Vasoepididymostomy is often considered one of the most technically challenging operations in the field of urology.
• Also, the longer the obstructive interval, the more likely it is that a vasoepididymostomy will be required.
• Recently, an  invagination vasoepididymostomy was described as an alternative to the mucosa-to-mucosa method.
• Under these circumstances an operation should be performed only by a micro-surgeon with proven vasoepididymostomy expertise, bypassing the blowouts.
• Web-based, computer models and calculations have been proposed and published that described the chance of needing an vasoepididymostomy at reversal surgery.
• Another issue to consider is the likelihood of vasoepididymostomy at the time of vasectomy reversal, as this technique is generally associated with lower patency and pregnancy rates than vasovasostomy.
• Higher success rates are found with reversal of vasovasostomy than those with a vasoepididymostomy, and factors such as antisperm antibodies and epididymal dysfunction are also implicated in success rates.
• If sperm are not found, then some surgeon consider this to be prime facie evidence that an epididymal obstruction is present and that an epididymis to vas deferens connection ( vasoepididymostomy ) should be considered to restore sperm flow.