In part i a mistaken sentence of a typical civil ease is analyzed . the reason why the case was made a mistaken is that the judges have no knowledge of the untypical joint and several liability . it is the reason why the article has been written 本部分从一则较有影响的案例入手,指出了该案例判决的不妥之处,并指出其错误根源之一在于不熟悉不真正连带债务理论,从而为文章后面对不真正连带债务的分析提供了铺垫。
The criminal law of china has done relatively extensive regulations to the crime of shield . there are typical crimes of shield that are named " shield " in its charges and untypical crimes of shield that have the content of shield, but are not named " shield " in its charges 我国刑法对包庇犯罪作了比较广泛的规定,有在罪名中被冠以“包庇”的“典型包庇犯罪”和具有包庇内容但罪名中没有“包庇”的“非典型包庇犯罪”。